Showing posts with label architecture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label architecture. Show all posts

Monday, August 7, 2023

The Medieval Monks Who Lived on Top of Giant Pillars



Stylite, Constantinople, 11th century

To our modern eyes, this is a profoundly weird image – but it would have been a recognisable, even iconic, one if we were living in the early medieval Middle East. To explain how we got here – and how that guy got on that pillar - we need to step back and tell the origin story of one of the most recognisable characters in medieval life: the monk.


First, let’s wind the clock back all the way to the mid-third century. Rome is still the bustling, million-strong metropole of a continent-spanning empire. Legionaries are off fighting battles against the Goths along the Danube. Christianity is a curious minority sect clinging to life despite often-ferocious persecution from the emperor’s officials. And in the wealthy province of Egypt, a young man, barely 18, who we will come to know as Anthony makes an unusual decision. Mourning the recent death of his parents, he finds inspiration in Christ’s teaching that the perfect man will give everything he has to the poor. Once he’s set aside a little of his money to provide for his younger sister’s welfare and chucked her in a convent, he departs for the endless desolation of Egypt’s desert interior (We have no idea, by the way, what the sister made of all this business. I suspect she was less than impressed).

Eventually, Anthony pitches up in an old, abandoned tomb in the desert, to live a life of isolation and mortification (a religious concept, meaning to deny the desires of the flesh), eating and drinking only just enough to keep his body at bare minimum functionality. Did this make him a devoted servant of Christ who accessed a level of connection with his god unprecedented for a mortal man, or a total bore? Your mileage may vary.

Unfortunately for Anthony, his dream of a life of solitary contemplation didn’t work out as planned. He quickly became a local celebrity, with countless Egyptian Christians making proto-pilgrimages to visit the home of a man they came to believe had a unique connection to the Almighty. This only got worse when Emperor Constantine legalised Christianity in 313, and Anthony moved further into the desert to avoid his admirers. 

Aran Prince-Tappé


More : https://weirdmedievalguys.substack.com/p/the-medieval-monks-who-lived-on-top




Sunday, January 15, 2023

Die kastalische Quelle mit Nischen für Weihungen


Ernst Reisinger, Delphi. Die kastalische Quelle mit Nischen für Weihungen / Δελφοί. Κασταλία πηγή με τις κόγχες για τα αναθήματα


Griechenland Schilderungen deutscher Reisender In zweiter, veränderter Auflage herausgegeben. Mit 90 Bildtafeln, davon 62 nach Aufnahmen der Preussischen Messbildanstalt, Λειψία, Insel-Verlag, 1923.

The Castalian spring in Delphi, with niches for votive offerings, 1923

Saturday, October 1, 2022

Builders, Housewives and the Construction of Modern Athens



Tassos Langis and Yannis Gaitanidis, Builders Housewives and the construction of Modern Athens, (still) 2022, film.

To celebrate the revised third edition of Ioanna Theocharopoulou’s book Builders, Housewives and the Construction of Modern Athens (Onassis Foundation, 2022), the Onassis Foundation is hosting a wide-ranging discussion in the context of Archtober 2022 (NYC's Architecture and Design Month) about the relevance of this modern city, its architecture, and ancient history. In a parallel trajectory, the Onassis Foundation produced documentary, by Tassos Langis and Yiannis Gaitanidis, based on Ioanna Theocharopoulou’s book and sharing the same title, begins (also this fall in New York) its United States and Canada tour, as part of the official Architecture and Design Film Festival program (2022–23).

North American premiere at the Architecture and Design Film Festival 2022
The city of Athens is so much more than the classical architecture that adorns it since there is a vibrant energy, buzz, and density that fills its streets and neighborhoods. The film Builders, Housewives and the Construction of Modern Athens (87 minutes, 2021) by Tassos Langis and Yiannis Gaitanidis unveils a new perspective of the city, examining the most distinctive Athenian building type—the polykatoikía—and the city's reconstruction by the anonymous lay builders and their housewives, who were the most unlikely “co-authors.” The documentary takes a deep dive into the lives of the provincials who came to Athens after the Civil War and sheds light on how they developed their craft and communicated with the educated architects. Based on the book of the same title by Ioanna Theocharopoulou, the film proposes a fascinating account of the provincials’ role and encounter with the “project of modernity.”

ADFF film screenings
September 30–October 1, 2022, New York: Cinépolis Cinemas: 260 W 23rd St: Friday, September 30, 6:45-8:45pm, Theatre 8 / Saturday, October 1, 4:15–6pm, Theatre 9.
November 2–5, 2022, Toronto
November 9–12, 2022, Vancouver
January 16–19, 2023, Los Angeles
January 26–29, 2023, Washington
February 2–5, 2023, Chicago

During the ADFF screenings in the United States and Canada, the third edition of the book will be available for purchase in collaboration with Actar Publishers.

Book launch & panel discussion at Archtober, New York
Thursday, October 13, 6–8pm
Center for Architecture, 536 LaGuardia Place, New York, NY 10012

Architectural historians have tended to disparage the lack of formal planning and the apparent homogeneity of Athen’s “box-like” concrete buildings. By casting Athens as a uniquely local mode of informal urbanism, a phenomenon that, in a broader sense, is found around the world and particularly in the “developing” world, Theocharopoulou’s book offers a critical re-evaluation of the city as a successful adaptation to circumstance, enriching our understanding of urbanism as a truly collective design activity. Builders, Housewives and the Construction of Modern Athens advocates for an architectural history that allows access to the conceptual worlds and the imaginations of builders and inhabitants. This approach departs from a focus on structures designed exclusively by architects and planners, to explore processes—financial, cultural, and material—that rely on self-organization and community. These improvisations and adaptations, which succeeded in producing a dense and vibrant city, can, in turn, help us imagine how to create more sustainable and livable urban models today.

Speakers: Simon Critchley, Hans Jonas Professor of Philosophy, The New School for Social Research / Neni Panourgiá, Adjunct Associate Professor, The Prison Education Program, Psychology Department; Academic Adviser, The Justice in Education Initiative, Columbia University / Ioanna Theocharopoulou, Visiting Lecturer, Department of Architecture, Art and Planning, Cornell University; Author, Builders, Housewives and the Construction of Modern Athens

 

Thursday, September 15, 2022

Persephone stumbled



Persephone stumbled

Persephone stumbled, 2022

Wood, concrete, lighting

Variable Dimensions


The site of Persephone’s abduction by Pluto is located in a crude wooden oblong
building—part of the Olive Mill’s factory zone—a section of which protrudes into the void. At this point, the association of the myth with the cycle of the land’s fertility within the industrial ruins is reshaped and reformulated. The imprint of the gesture of the ascent and descent of Demeter’s daughter finds correspondences with the storage of industrial products and the cycle of production.

 

 

Organised by 2023 Eleusis European Capital of Culture & Aeschylia Festival 2022

A production of 2023 Eleusis European Capital of Culture

Old Olive Mill, Elefsina

28/8 - 23/10 

Wednesday, September 7, 2022

ΜΕΓΑΛΟΥΠΟΛΕΙΣ/ ΝΗΣΙΑ: ΑΛΛΑΓΗ ΠΑΡΑΔΕΙΓΜΑΤΟΣ


Γιατί φούντωσε ξαφνικά το ενδιαφέρον για τις καταστροφές του υπερτουρισμού στα ελληνικά νησιά, ιδίως στις Κυκλάδες, αλλά και σε άλλους παράκτιους προορισμούς; Ένα τέτοιο ερώτημα δεν πρέπει να το αντιμετωπίζουμε μακριά από τo συμπληρωματικό του: Γιατί εξακολουθεί να έλκει η Αθήνα τους περιβόητους «ξένους επενδυτές» αλλά και ανήσυχους νέους δημιουργούς και ερευνητές απ’ όλο τον κόσμο, επιφέροντας μια άνευ προηγουμένου μεταβολή στην ίδια την κοινωνική δομή της πόλης και στην αγορά ακινήτων, κυρίως λόγω της μολυσματικής εξάπλωσης του Airbnb; Η καλή φίλη Ίρις Λυκουριώτη ξεκίνησε τη συζήτηση στα κοινωνικά δίκτυα για να συνεχίσει εδώ στα «Πρόσωπα» των «Νέων», με μια διαυγή τοποθέτηση-οδηγό, στην οποία τρύπωξαν στη συνέχεια κι άλλοι. Στην ακολουθία αυτή συνεχίζω σκαλίζοντας τον πυρήνα του θέματος που ενεργοποιεί νέες κοινωνικές και περιβαλλοντικές σχέσεις, ροές, δυναμικές και εντάσεις.
Η ΚΟΥΛΤΟΥΡΑ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΜΦΟΡΗΣΗΣ
Το 1978 κυκλοφορεί το Delirious New York, το διαβόητο αναδρομικό μανιφέστο του ολλανδού αρχιτέκτονα Rem Koolhaas για το Μανχάταν, το οποίο έμελε να αποτελέσει ένα βιβλίο σύμβολο της δεκαετίας. Πλάι σ’ αυτό θα προσέθετα το Λος Άντζελες: Η αρχιτεκτονική των τεσσάρων οικολογιών (1971) του Reyner Banham και το Μαθαίνοντας από το Λας Βέγκας (1972) των Venturi, Scott Brown και Izenour. Ας κρατήσουμε για την ώρα τα ονόματα των τριών πρωταγωνιστριών πόλεων: Νέα Υόρκη, Λος Άντζελες και Λας Βέγκας. Μέσα από μια παθιασμένη πρόζα και προπάντων κυνικό λυρισμό ο Koolhaas υποστηρίζει ότι από το 1850 η απότομη αύξηση του πληθυσμού και της τεχνολογίας κατέστησαν τη μητροπολιτική νήσο του Μανχάταν ένα είδος εργαστηρίου για τη γέννηση ενός ιδιαίτερου τρόπου ζωής: την «κουλτούρα της συμφόρησης». Τα χρόνια που ακολούθησαν η εξύμνηση της παραληρηματικής πυκνότητας των μεγαλουπόλεων, που αντιπαρατίθεται στη διαλυτική εξάπλωση των προαστίων (sprawl), αναδείχθηκε σε ένα είδος τερματικού του δυτικού πολιτισμού.
Οδηγώντας σε κραιπάλη όλες τις παρανοϊκές ψευδαισθήσεις της πρώιμης νεωτερικότητας, ο Koolhaas επιλέγει το παραθαλάσσιο θέρετρο και το λούνα παρκ του Coney Island ως το χαρακτηριστικό παράδειγμα μιας σειράς «τεχνοψυχικών» μηχανισμών που υλοποιήθηκαν χωρίς καμία επίσημη εξαγγελία. Μεταξύ πολλών άλλων, ενδεικτικά αναφέρω την «ηλεκτρική κολύμβηση» –δηλαδή το κολύμπι με τεχνητό φωτισμό κατά τη διάρκεια της νύχτας– εφόσον λόγω της υπερβολικής «συμφόρησης» οι περισσότεροι επισκέπτες δεν κατόρθωναν να βρουν μια θέση στον ήλιο της παραλίας και να κολυμπήσουν τη μέρα. Οπότε, ανάγοντας μια διαδεδομένη παραθαλάσσια εμπειρία σε μητροπολιτικό σύστημα βάρδιας, η τεχνολογία ήδη από τα τέλη του 19ου αιώνα υποκαθιστά τη «φυσική» εμπειρία. Σ’ ένα τέτοιο εξ ολοκλήρου τεχνητό σύμπαν –το οποίο ο συγγραφέας αποκαλεί «ζωή μέσα στη φαντασία»– το φυσικό και το τεχνητό, το πραγματικό και το φανταστικό δεν μπορούν να διαχωριστούν.
Η επιρροή αυτού του παραληρηματικού –πράγματι– βιβλίου σ’ όλη την αρχιτεκτονική κουλτούρα υπήρξε απροσμέτρητη, ακόμη κι όταν μας αρέσει να το αμφισβητούμε. Κι αυτό γιατί πάνω απ’ όλα περιγράφει τη διάχυση μιας νέας περιβαλλοντικής και κοινωνικής συνθήκης, καθώς και τις πιο εξωφρενικές καινοτομίες και φαντασιώσεις του ύστερου καπιταλισμού, στην κατεξοχήν μητρόπολη, ως ένα συλλογικό έργο το οποίο δημιουργήθηκε χωρίς την πρόθεση κανενός αρχιτέκτονα: Πρόκειται για το σχεδόν αυτόματο υποπροϊόν ενός συλλογικού μητροπολιτικού υποκειμένου. Μην ξεχνάμε ότι μια τέτοια θεώρηση έδωσε και σ’ εμάς τη δυνατότητα να διαβάσουμε με διαφορετικούς όρους το φαινόμενο της αθηναϊκής πολυκατοικίας. Στην αστική μήτρα της οποίας ο ιστορικός της αρχιτεκτονικής Kenneth Frampton διέκρινε το 1985 μια μορφή αναπαραγωγής του κατακερματισμένου μωσαϊκού των νησιωτικών οικισμών. Όσο κι αν φαίνεται παράδοξη μια τέτοια σύνδεση, τόσο οι νησιωτικοί παραδοσιακοί οικισμοί, όσο το Μανχάταν και η αθηναϊκή πολυκατοικία είναι το μέγιστο επίτευγμα ενός συλλογικού υποκειμένου.
Το λέω αυτό γιατί νομίζω ότι είναι λάθος και μάλλον αφελές να διαχωρίζουμε σχηματικά την πόλη απ’ ότι συμβαίνει στα νησιά ή στην ύπαιθρο λες και πρόκειται για τους αντιπροσωπευτικούς τόπους της «κόλασης» και του χαμένου «φυσικού παραδείσου», αντίστοιχα. Αυτός είναι, εξάλλου, ο φανταστικός πυρήνας του μαζικού τουρισμού, ο οποίος καταστρέφει αδυσώπητα ό,τι πασχίζει αγχωτικά να «απολαύσει» και να «διασώσει» ως εμπειρία.
ΝΗΣΙΑ: Η "ΣΤΗΛΗ ΤΗΣ ΡΟΖΕΤΤΑΣ" ΤΟΥ 21ου ΑΙΩΝΑ;
Ωστόσο, μετά από σχεδόν πέντε δεκαετίες, οι αντιλήψεις μας για την «κουλτούρα της συμφόρησης» έχουν αλλάξει εντελώς. Αν το Delirious New York ήταν το βιβλίο που θεματοποίησε μια σειρά μη ορθολογικές έννοιες και συμπεριφορές της μεταμοντέρνας εποχής, τι γίνεται σήμερα, που η κλιματική αλλαγή, οι συνεχείς μεταναστευτικές ροές, οι εκτεταμένες επιπτώσεις της «ανθρωπόκαινου», τα ανθρώπινα και μη ανθρώπινα οικοσυστήματα αλλάζουν τις αντιλήψεις μας για το τοπίο και το περιβάλλον σ’ ολόκληρο τον κόσμο; Οι φαντασιώσεις του Coney Island και του Ουρανοξύστη δεν μπορούν πλέον σε καμία περίπτωση να αποτελέσουν παραδείγματα αυτής της νέας συνθήκης. Σε τέτοιο βαθμό, που ακόμη και ίδιος ο Koolhaas έσπευσε να παρουσιάσει το 2020 στο Guggenheim της Νέας Υόρκης, την έκθεση-έρευνα Countryside: The Future: Το ντελίριο της «συμφόρησης» αντικαθίσταται από τις ραγδαίες αλλαγές που υφίστανται οι αγροτικές και απομακρυσμένες περιοχές του πλανήτη που αποκαλούμε «ύπαιθρο», ήτοι το 98% της συνολικής επιφάνειας της Γης.
Η αλλαγή παραδείγματος είναι επιτακτική επειδή η επιβίωση όχι μόνο του δικού μας αλλά ολόκληρου του ανθρώπινου πολιτισμού στη Γη θα εξαρτηθεί από τις απαντήσεις που θα καταφέρουμε να δώσουμε. Παρότι παραμένει ένα πολύτιμο σημείο αναφοράς, δεν αρκεί να μιλήσει κανείς σήμερα για το «παρόν και το μέλλον» του τουρισμού στη χώρα μας με τον τρόπο έγραψαν ο Γιώργος Κανδύλης, ο Άρης Κωνσταντινίδης, ο Αριστομένης Προβελέγγιος, και ο Α. Καλίνσκη στο πρώτο τεύχος του περιοδικού «Αρχιτεκτονικά Θέματα», το 1967. Διαφορετικές γενιές αρχιτεκτόνων που ακολούθησαν αναζήτησαν διάφορες λύσεις, παράγοντας ένα πλατύ δίκτυ συνδυασμών, αναγνώσεων (δηλαδή «αναγνωρίσεων») αλλά και παραναγνώσεων του τοπίου. Στη συζήτηση που επανεκκίνησε –και ελπίζω να κρατήσει– η Ίρις Λυκουριώτη δοκιμάζει στο πολιτικό φαντασιακό (που τόσο έχουμε ανάγκη σήμερα) και στις σχεδιαστικές μορφές της «αποανάπτυξης»• άλλοι αναζητούν «έξυπνες λύσεις», άλλοι εξακολουθούν να σπαταλούν την κουλτούρα της συμφόρησης στην ατομικότητα και την πολυτελή αισθητική του καλού γούστου, χωρίς να λείπουν και εκείνοι που επιμένουν στο δημοκρατικό δικαίωμα της απόλαυσης. Οι μόνοι που δεν κάνουν απολύτως τίποτα είναι οι αρμόδιοι κυβερνητικοί και διοικητικοί θεσμοί, οι οποίοι σωρεύουν εδώ και χρόνια μια σειρά νομοθετικών παρεκκλίσεων και πονηρών εκτροπών, οι επιπτώσεις των οποίων σήμερα τρομάζουν ενώ αναδιατυπώνονται στο διηνεκές.
Εντούτοις, η απειλή του «υπερτουρισμού» δεν είναι ένα επιμέρους εποχικό πρόβλημα επειδή αφορά τον ίδιο τον τρόπο με τον οποίο κατοικούμε τη Γη. Εκεί ακριβώς έγκειται ο καταστρεπτικός του χαρακτήρας που μας εξοργίζει: Στην αδυναμία κατοίκησης η οποία, θα προσέθετα, δεν αφορά μόνο τους τουρίστες ή τον τουρισμό αλλά όλους μας. Γι αυτό και δεν μπορούμε να αποφύγουμε την αναμέτρηση με ορισμένα καίρια ερωτήματα που διαθέτουν διακριτό ανθρωπολογικό εκτόπισμα: Τι σημαίνει, για παράδειγμα, σήμερα να κατοικείς ή να ταξιδεύεις σε μια χώρα, σε μια πόλη, σε μια υπαίθρια περιοχή, σ’ ένα νησί ακόμη και στους πιο δημοφιλής προορισμούς του μαζικού τουρισμού; Και ειδικότερα στην περίπτωσή μας: μπορούμε να φανταστούμε το μέλλον και τον τουρισμό της χώρας μας με όρους κατοίκησης; Εδώ ανακύπτουν οι χρόνιες εκκρεμότητες της πολιτειακής και της αρχιτεκτονικής μας κουλτούρας που συχνά μετατρέπουν την «πολεοδομία» σε ένα είδος «πολεοκτονίας», και στην περίπτωση των νησιωτικών οικισμών, «νησιοκτονίας»: Δεν διαθέτουμε καμία συλλογικά αποδεκτή αντίληψη για το πώς φανταζόμαστε όχι μόνο το μέλλον των νησιών και των παραθαλάσσιων περιοχών αλλά και του συμπληρωματικού τους αντίστοιχου, των πόλεων. Και δεν εννοώ, βέβαια, τον μανιακό περιορισμό στα ιστορικά παραδείγματα της δεκαετίας του 1960, ή στη νοσταλγία και τη χειροτεχνία του «τι ωραία που ήμασταν κάποτε».
Αν λοιπόν ο μισός αιώνας που μόλις τελείωσε (1970-2020) είχε ως πρότυπο τις μεγαλουπόλεις οι οποίες καθιέρωσαν τη θυελλώδη ψηφιακή αποϋλοποίηση και την ενσωμάτωση των τεχνολογιών των μέσων ενημέρωσης, το μέλλον της αστικής κατάστασης μοιάζει να βρίσκεται όλο και περισσότερο σε αυτό που δεν μπορεί πλέον να παραχθεί σ’ αυτές. Η ολοκληρωτική διάχυση του ψηφιακού σύμπαντος και η κλιματική αλλαγή δεν μπορούν παρά να μεταβάλλουν ριζικά τις αντιλήψεις μας για την κατοίκηση και την πόλη. Σε μια τέτοια αναθεώρηση η επιδημία του Covid συνέβαλε κι αυτή με τον τρόπο της, χωρίς ωστόσο να διατηρεί μοναδικό ρόλο.
Αν, λοιπόν, το Μανχάταν ήταν η «Στήλη της Ροζέττας» του 20ου αιώνα, ορισμένα μικρότερα περιαστικά ή ορεινά κέντρα, οι παραθαλάσσιοι οικισμοί και τα ελληνικά νησιά θα μπορούσαν, υπό προϋποθέσεις, να διεκδικήσουν τον ρόλο αυτό για τον 21ο αιώνα, μόνο αν καταφέρουν να αποφύγουν τη μετατροπή τους σε εφιαλτικούς μη-τόπους του υπερτουρισμού. Γι αυτό και είμαστε υποχρεωμένοι να την αποκωδικοποιήσουμε.
ΓΙΩΡΓΟΣ ΤΖΙΡΤΖΙΛΑΚΗΣ
ΜΕΓΑΛΟΥΠΟΛΕΙΣ/ ΝΗΣΙΑ: ΑΛΛΑΓΗ ΠΑΡΑΔΕΙΓΜΑΤΟΣ
Τα Νέα Σαββατοκύριακο, 3-4 Σεπτεμβρίου 2022

Sunday, May 15, 2022

Schindler House: 100 Years in the Making

 



Photographer Unknown, “Construction of the Schindler House using the Slab-Tilt process,” 1922. Courtesy of Art, Design & Architecture Museum, University of California, Santa Barbara

 

Schindler House: 100 Years in the Making emphasizes acts of making, unmaking, and remaking carried out by artists, architects, historians, writers, organizers, and cultural practitioners that have constituted the house and its mythos over this century. Designed and built by 1922, the house was in its first instantiation a radical proposition for modern collective dwelling in a minimal existence—a campsite enclosed by concrete, glass, and redwood. But the house was also constantly in flux, painted, carpeted, curtained, dismantled, reconstructed, excavated, and reimagined. The house’s experimental promise, first put forth now one hundred years ago, lives on today. 

 

Schindler House: 100 Years in the Making guides visitors through Schindler’s cooperative dwelling for two couples, built for himself, his wife Pauline, and their friends Clyde and Marian Chace. Each studio hosts a gentle timeline of landscape and property, construction and maintenance, guests (invited and otherwise) and domesticity, and preservation and pedagogy. Thematic topics are uncovered by various contributors, including historical and archival documents from Reyner Banham, Bernard Judge, Esther McCoy, and R.M. Schindler from the collections of the UCSB Architecture & Design Collections, Los Angeles TimesLong Beach Press Telegram, UC Berkeley Collections, UCLA Young Research Library Special Collections, UCLA Department of Architecture & Urban Design, Archives of American Art at the Smithsonian Institution, Southern California Institute of Architecture Media Archive, Architectural Association Photo Library, and USC Undergraduate Architecture Program. 

Artists and contributors to the exhibition include:

Carmen Argote,Fiona Connor,Julian Hoeber,Kathi Hofer,stephanie mei huang,Andrea Lenardin Madden,Renée Petropoulos,Gala Porras-Kim,Stephen Prina,Jakob Sellaoui, Peter Shire

 

With an emphasis on process over finality, the exhibition incorporates a rotating vitrine which accommodates the display and interpretation of new materials that emerge during the run of the show. Materials on display from the collections of the UCSB Architecture & Design Collections, Los Angeles Times, Long Beach Press Telegram, UCLA Young Research Library Special Collections, UCLA Department of Architecture & Urban Design, Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) collection at the Library of Congress, National Parks Service, Southern California Institute of Architecture Media Archive, Architectural Association Photo Library, and USC Undergraduate Architecture Program will be on view.

The exhibition is complemented by summer-long programming and events including seminars, lectures, reading groups, benefit events, edible performances, in-person curator-led tours, and asynchronous audio tours.

 

 

 

SAT, MAY 28, 2022-  SUN, SEP 25, 2022

 

https://www.makcenter.org/exhibitions/centennial

Saturday, August 14, 2021

Castalian Fountain


Η Κασταλία πηγή. Δελφοί, 1903. 
Castalian Fountain, where Pilgrims bathed before consulting the Oracle 

#ΚασταλιαΠηγη #Delphi #Δελφοι#underwoodbrothers #oracle #fountain

Friday, August 13, 2021

Monte Verità




Harald Szeemann, Monte Verità — installation view at Kunsthaus Zurich, 1978

 

 

 

 

 

Monte Verità: "The place where our minds can reach up to the heavens..."
Harald Szeemann , April 1985

 

In the nineteenth century and at the beginning of the twentieth, the Ticino, republic and canton since 1803, became a gateway to the south and favourite destination of a group of unconventional loners who found in the region, with its southern atmosphere, fertile ground in which to sow the seeds of the utopia they were unable to cultivate in the north. The Ticino came to represent the antithesis of the urbanised, industrialized north, a sanctuary for all kinds if idealist. From 1900 onwards Mount Monescia above Ascona became a pole of attraction for those seeking an ‘'alternative'' life. These reformers who sought a third way between the capitalist and communist blocks, eventually found a home in the region of the north Italian lakes.

The founders came from all directions : Henry Oedenkoven from Antwerp, the pianist Ida Hofmann from Montenegro, the artist Gusto and the ex-officer Karl Gräser from Transylvania. United by a common ideal they settled on the ‘'Mount of Truth'' as they renamed Monte Monescia.
Draped in loose flowing garments and with long hair they worked in the gardens and fields, built spartan timber cabins and found relaxation in dancing and naked bathing, exposing their bodies to light, air, sun and water. Their diet excluded all animal foods and was based entirely on plants, vegetables and fruit. They workshipped nature, preaching its purity and interpreting it symbolically as the ultimate work of art: ‘'Parsifal's meadow'', ‘'The rock of Valkyrie'' and the ‘'Harrassprung'' were symbolic names which with time were adopted even by the local population of Ascona who had initially regarded the community with suspicion.

Their social organisation based on the co-operative system and through which they strove to achieve the emancipation of women, self-criticism, new ways of cultivating mind and spirit and the unity of body and soul, can at the best be described as a Christian-communist community. The intensity of the single ideals fused in this community was such that word of it soon spread across the whole of Europe and overseas, whilst gradually over the years the community itself became a sanatorium frequented by theosophists, reformers, anarchists, communists, socialdemocrats, psyco-analysts, followed by literary personalities, writers, poets, artists and finally emigrants of both world wars: Raphael Friedeberg, Prince Peter Kropotkin, Erich Mühsam who declared Ascona ‘'the Republic of the Homeless'', Otto Gross who planned a ‘'School for the liberation of humanity'', August Bebel, Karl Kautsky, Otto Braun, even perhaps Lenin and Trotzki, Hermann Hesse, Franziska Gräfin zu Reventlow, Else Lasker-Schüler, D.H Lawrence, Rudolf von Laban, Mary Wigman, Isadora Duncan, Hugo Ball, Hans Arp, Hans Richter, Marianne von Werefkin, Alexej von Jawlensky, Arthur Segal, El Lissitzky and many others.


After the departure of the founder for Brazil in 1920 there followed a brief bohemian period at the Monte Verità which lasted until the complex was purchased as a residence by the Baron von der Heydt, banker to the ex-Kaiser Willhelm II and one of the most important collectors of contemporary and non European art. The bohemian life continued in the village and in the Locarnese valleys from then on.

The Mount, now used as a Hotel and park, still maintains its almost magic power of attraction. Along with the proven magnetic anomalies of geological formations underlying Ascona, it is as if the mount preserves, hidden away out of sight, the sum of all the successful and unsuccessful attempts to breach the gap between the ‘'I'' and ‘'we'', and the striving towards an ideal creative society, thus making the Monte Verità a special scenic and climatic micro-paradise.

The Monte Verità is also however a well preserved testimony for the history of architecture. From Adam's hut to the Bauhaus. The ideology of the first settlers demanded spartan chalet-like timber dwellings with plenty of light and air and few comforts. Shortly after 1900 the following buildings began to spring up: Casa Selma (now museum), [...], Casa Andrea with its geometrical façade, the sunniest of the buildings (now converted), Casa Elena and the Casa del Tè - Tea House (now demolished) and the Casa dei Russi (hideout for Russian students after the 1905 revolution and now undergoing renovation). The Casa Centrale was built for the community and allowed for maximum natural light. Ying-Yang symbols were worked into windows and balconies. (In 1948 this building was demolished to make way for a restaurant and only the curving flight of steps remains).

Henry Oedenkoven built Casa Anatta as living quarters and reception rooms in the theosophist style with rounded corners everywhere, double timber walls, sliding doors, domed ceilings and huge windows with views of the landscape as supreme works of art, a large flat roof and sun-terrace.

In the mains rooms of this building Mary Wingman danced, Bebel, Kautsky and Martin Buber discussed, Ida Hofmann played Wagner and the community held its reunions. In 1926 the Baron von der Heydt converted Casa Anatta into a private residence and adorned it with his collection of African, Indian and Chinese art, now housed at Rietberg Museum, and a collection of Swiss carnival masks which is now in Washington. After the death of the Baron in 1964 the Casa Anatta, described by the architecture theorist Siegfried Giedion in 1929 as a perfect example of ‘'liberated living'', fell into disuse and dilapidation. In 1979 it was re-activated to house the Monte Verità exhibition and has been the History Museum of the Monte Verità since 1981. (Open to the public from April to October). In 1909 the Turinese architect Anselmo Secondo built the Villa Semiramis as a guest house and hotel. The Villa, clinging to the mountain side, presents many architectural characteristics of the Piedmont ‘'Jugendstil'' of which the triangular shutters are the most striking example. In 1970 work was carried out to remodernize the Villa, true to the original style, under the direction of the Ticinese architect Livio Vacchini. The arrival of the Baron on the Mount marked the advent of modern architecture in the Ticino The original contract for a hotel in the characteristically rational and functional Bauhaus style went to Mies van der Rohe and was executed by Emil Fahrenkamp, builder of the Shell Building in Berlin and later designer of the Rhein Steel Works. Like Casa Anatta, the Hotel is built against the rock face. The design both of the exterior and of the rooms is simple and clear-cut and the suites are furnished in the Bauhaus tradition. The reception rooms and the corridors are light and airy and the metalwork studied down to the smallest detail.Thanks to the construction of the Hotel, Bauhaus masters such as Gropius, Albers, Bayer, Breuer, Feiniger, Schlemmer, Schawinksy and Moholy-Nagy visited Ascona and the Monte Verità and there discovered what Ise Gropius was to put into words in 1978 ‘‘A place where our minds can reach up to the heavens...''.

 

Text by Caitlin Murray 

 

http://www.impossibleobjectsmarfa.com/fragments/monte-verit?rq=monte%20verita

 

Friday, January 8, 2021

The Politics of Materials : Transparency and Intimacy

What are the limits of design in addressing political challenges? We might first want to ask: which politics? The ‘small p’ politics of everyday, negotiated, shared space suggested by the Greek root of the word (politika – affairs of the city; or politikos – relating to citizens)? This scale of quotidian interpersonal politics in the public realm concerns fundamentally material issues such as the right to presence and visibility in and practical agency over urban space. But what about the ‘big P’ Politics [1] of parties, legislation, and bureaucracy, that is less immediately material? Evidently there is no clear line between the two, and so I would like to start by looking at a failure in design for Politics to open up questions for a more material and aesthetic discussion of design for politics. 

In 1999 Foster and Partners completed a renovation of the Reichstag in Berlin, including a glass cupola over the chamber, “allowing people to ascend symbolically above the heads of their representatives”. [2] This is just the most recent in a series of post-war German parliament buildings constructed around what Deborah Barnstone calls an “ideology of transparency”, posited by futurist design thinkers and almost entirely uncritically taken hold of in both architecture and politics as the material embodiment of the ideal of accountable, accessible government.[3] However, rather than creating a system for transparent democracy, this design takes the most literal meaning of the word ‘transparent’ and looks for its material equivalent in glass. It conflates a material fact – the ability for glass to convey a complete image – with a way of doing things. If transparency in politics has meaning only as far as being able to see what politicians are doing, then within the scope of its setting the glass dome succeeds. If, as we would hope, it is supposed to be a tool for holding the political system accountable through involvement, it fails. The kind of transparency it creates is the same as that set up in the theatre between stage and audience: information and affect passes in one direction; the public is a set of eyes rather than a set of interlocutors. Because we inherited a word for information passing through material to approximate the way information passes between political actors and the public, the representation of democracy in glass has been able, at times, to supersede the process of democracy itself.

The Campo de Cebada in Madrid has become one of the best known spaces for bottom-up democracy. Following a series of assemblies debating the future of the vacant, city-owned public site, lightweight shelters and bleachers were constructed from recycled wood allowing it to be used for peer-to-peer education, performance, and local democracy. Built on the basis of necessity for and by its users, it appears on the surface to be the epitome of material functionalism. Why, then, is its aesthetic so instantly recognizable? Why have ply and wooden boarding come to be so expressive of (small-p) political? There are obvious pragmatic reasons: they are cheap and durable. But there are also ways of doing things encoded in these materials. Could ergonomic properties of materials could become political? Take weight: how many humans and/or non-humans does it take to lift a plate of glass versus a plank of wood? Ply and scaffold can be manipulated by non-specialists, giving us a ‘DIY’ ethic/aesthetic/politic. Even at this most seemingly pragmatic a relationship with materials there is a conflation of language that blurs the functional and symbolic. Grass-roots or DIY political organization literally uses the same tools and materials as home improvements, borrowing a material way of doing things and inheriting with it a symbolic aesthetic of the intimacy of the domestic interior. 

Wood is intimate. It is for building a hut, not a parliament. It belongs to the world of communality and physical affect, which Hannah Arendt distinguishes clearly from the world of the Political.4 But wood also contains things within it and traps them: it does not transmit information. It holds affect at the scale of the intimate and the immediate. Glass is implicated in the technologies of mass media. It allows mediated affect to pass through it whilst keeping bodies apart. Just as the Reichstag fails in doing Political transparency because of its literally symbolic interpretation, it succeeds in doing other things like the communication of power outwards from a centre. Just because its symbolism does not equal its function, does not mean we should not pay attention to its functionality. Inversely with wood at the Campo de Cebada: it is highly effective in doing DIY politics, economically and ergonomically, but in doing so symbolizes a communality and an immediacy that puts it in aesthetic opposition to Politics. This may well be the aim, but then how does it scale up, expand, and grow as a movement whilst holding on to the material symbols it has created for itself? Does wood symbolically trap the political in the realm of the intimate, shared between initiates to that realm, and exclude a wider public?

Text by John Bingham-Hall

NOTES

[1] Capitalisation observed to distinguish throughout
[2] http://www.fosterandpartners.com/projects/ reichstag-new-german-parliament/
[3] Deborah Ascher Barnstone, The Transparent State: Architecture and Politics in Postwar Germany(Routledge, 2004).
[iv] Hannah Arendt, “The Public Realm: The Common,” in The Public Face of Architecture, ed. Mark Lilla and Nathan Glazer (London & New York: The Free Press, 1987), 4–12.

 Originally published in Designing Politics: The Limits of Design. Theatrum Mundi - LSE Cities - Fondation Maison des sciences de l'homme. 2016


https://www.readingdesign.org/politics-of-materials