Pavel Büchler,
Work (All the cigarette breaks), 2007–2014
Sunday, August 27, 2017
Work (All the cigarette breaks)
Friday, August 25, 2017
Aladdin Toys Catalogue
Joaquin
Torres Garcia, Aladdin Toys Catalog, 1920's
Labels:
Bauhaus,
covers,
manuals and Instructions,
modernities,
Toys and Models
Sunday, August 20, 2017
How to Read El Pato Pascual: Disney’s Latin America and Latin America’s Disney
José
Rodolfo Loaiza Ontiveros
Organized by
the MAK Center for Art and Architecture in cooperation with the
Luckman Fine Arts Complex at Cal State LA, How to Read El Pato
Pascual: Disney’s Latin America and Latin America’s Disney is
a Pacific Standard Time: LA/LA exhibition of over 150 works by 48
Latin American artists who investigate and challenge nearly one
hundred years of cultural influence between Latin America and Disney.
Spanning painting, photography, graphic work, drawing, sculpture,
video, documents, and the critical responses generated, the joint
exhibition explores the idea that there are no clean boundaries
between art, culture, and geography, and deconstructs how such
notions are formed and disputed.
The
exhibition’s curators, filmmaker/writer Jesse Lerner and artist
Rubén Ortiz-Torres, thoroughly examined Disney’s long engagement
with Latin American culture, from Donald Duck’s first featured role
in the 1937 Mexican-themed short Don Donald
to the company’s 2013 attempt to trademark the Day of the Dead.
Lerner and Oritz-Torres’s research further drew from a pivotal trip
Walt Disney took with his team to South America in 1941. Along with a
group of fifteen animators, musicians, and screenwriters, Disney flew
to over five South American countries as part of a U.S.
government-directed effort to promote the “Good Neighbor” policy
during the Second World War. In addition to the celebrated film The
Three Caballeros, this trip
produced the feature Saludos Amigos; a
“making of” documentary titled South of the Border with
Disney; and propaganda films
such as The Grain that Built a Hemisphere.
The
infamous 1971 Chilean book by scholars Ariel Dorfman and Armand
Mattelart, Para leer al Pato Donald (How to Read Donald
Duck), was brought to
Ortiz-Torres’s attention while studying with artist Michael Asher
at the Disney-funded CalArts in the 1990s. The book (formerly banned
in Chile and threatened by legal action in the U.S.) provides a
structural analysis denouncing the ways in which Disney comic books
were used as vehicles to justify and promote U.S. policies and
cultural imperialism.
As
curators, Lerner and Ortiz-Torres intend to show that Disney cannot
be seen as something simply exported to the rest of the Americas, and
passively received. Like any other cultural force or mythology in
Latin America, Disney imagery has always been quickly reinterpreted,
assimilated, adapted, cannibalized, syncretized, and subverted by
artists: sculptor Nadín Ospina creates pre-Columbian-like objects
portraying Disney characters using carved stone and gold; artist
Enrique Chagoya juxtaposes imagery from codices, indigenous
iconography, and popular graphics that include Disney characters in a
postcolonial critique; Liliana Porter has produced conceptual
graphics and photography where Disney toys are juxtaposed with
recognizable figures such as Che Guevara. Photographs like Antonio
Turok’s show how Disney iconography has been intertwined with daily
life in Latin America. Arturo Herrera’s work plays with our almost
innate ability to immediately recognize Disney characters, no matter
how abstracted: the artist will present a new mural near the
Schindler House, on the side of the West Elm building at 8366 Beverly
Blvd, Los Angeles 90048, on view through the length of the
exhibition.
Due to its size
and scope, the exhibition will be presented in two locations: the
Schindler House in West Hollywood and the Luckman Gallery at Cal
State LA. One is an intimate 1922 modernist historical landmark loved
by architecture and design enthusiasts; the other is a large gallery
space situated across town and catering to a diverse and young campus
audience.
A
catalogue published by Black Dog Publishing and designed by Jorge
Verdin accompanies the exhibition. Included is an introduction by the
curators; essays by Fabián Cereijido, Nate Harrison, Jesse Lerner,
Rubén Ortiz-Torres, Darlene J. Sadlier, and Carla Zaccagnini; a
reprinting of the English version of Para leer al Pato
Donald (How to Read Donald Duck)
from 1973; Ariel Dorfman’s reflections on the book; and a checklist
of works with full-color images. The publication will be in both
English and Spanish.
Jesse
Lerner and Rubén Oritz-Torres each bring considerable knowledge to
the exhibition project and publication. Both are artists and
academics—teaching at Pitzer College and UC San Diego,
respectively—whose work explores the boundaries of culture and art;
their fields of expertise and methodologies, though distinct,
complement each other and often overlap. They previously collaborated
in the production of the film Frontierland
and in curating MEX/LA, ‘Mexican’ Modernism(s) in Los
Angeles 1930-1985 for the Museum
of Latin American Art in Long Beach in 2011. Scholar Fabián
Cereijido is the assistant curator of the exhibition.
Exhibition
artists: Lalo
Alcaraz, Florencia Aliberti, Sergio Allevato, Pedro
Álvarez, Carlos Amorales, Rafael Bqueer, Mel
Casas, Alida Cervantes, Enrique Chagoya, Abraham
Cruzvillegas, Minerva Cuevas, Einar and Jamex De la
Torre, Rodrigo Dorfman, Dr. Lakra, El Ferrus, Demián
Flores, Pedro Friedeberg, Scherezade Garcia, Alicia
Mihai Gazcue, Arturo Herrera, Alberto Ibañez, Claudio
Larrea, Nelson Leirner, Fernando Lindote, José
Rodolfo Loaiza Ontiveros, Marcos López, José Luis and
José Carlos Martinat, Carlos Mendoza, Pedro Meyer, Florencio
Molina Campos, Mondongo, Jaime Muñoz, Rivane
Neuenschwander, Rafael Montañez Ortiz, Nadín
Ospina, Leopoldo Peña, Liliana Porter, Artemio
Rodríguez, Agustín Sabella, Daniel Santoro, Mariángeles
Soto-Díaz, Magdalena Suarez Frimkess, Antonio Turok, Meyer
Vaisman, Ramón Valdiosera Berman, Angela Wilmot, Robert
Yager, Carla Zaccagnini.
On view
September 11, 2017–January 14, 2018
Saturday, August 19, 2017
Words in the Forms of Poems
Announcement.
Black
offset on one side. For the show at John Weber Gallery, NYC, Jan. 11
- Feb. 5, 1975. 12.7x21.1 cm.
Saturday, August 12, 2017
Το ναυάγιο που φέρνει την ευτυχία
Labels:
Children's literature,
Greek modernity,
Robinsonades
Saturday, August 5, 2017
Album amicorum
A wooden die
A
wooden die can be described only from without. We are therefore
condemned to eternal ignorance of its essence. Even if it is cut in
two, immediately its inside becomes a wall and there occurs the
lightning-swift transformation of a mystery into a skin.
For
this reason it is impossible to lay foundations for the psychology of
a stone ball, of an iron bar, of a wooden cube.
Zbigniew
Herbert, 1968
Emblematic still life
Johannes
Torrentius, Emblematic still life with flagon, glass, jug and bridle,
signed and dated “T. 1614”, Rijksmuseum
Careful with the table
At
the table you should sit calmly and not daydream. Let us recall what
an effort it took for the stormy ocean tides to arrange themselves in
quiet rings. A moment of inattention and everything might wash away.
It is also forbidden to rub the table legs, as they are very
sensitive. Everything at the table must be done coolly and
matter-of-factly. You can't sit down here with things not completely
thought through. For daydreaming we have been given other objects
made of wood: the forest, the bed.
Zbigniew Herbert, 1961
Labels:
East European Poetry,
furniture,
Objects,
Poetry
Thursday, August 3, 2017
Wednesday, August 2, 2017
Παίδες πηγών
Έρχεται
πάλι
Τι
σημαίνουν εκείνα τα ονόματα;
Και
ποια βουνά
μοιράζουν το κρύο
σε στόμα
και μάτια;
Πάντα
υπάρχει ένας Βορράς
άγρια ποθητός
με γένια αιχμηρά
και
πολύ περπάτημα
μέχρι τα νερά που
καθρεφτίζουν –
η
εικόνα τραντάζει το σώμα
Σαν
να ’ταν η πρώτη φορά
*
Επειδή
δεν είμαι εκείνος
Δεν
αντέχω να νιώσω
ποιος είναι αυτός
που
μου στέλνει τον άνεμο
Τον
στέλνει
λέω
αυτή
η πλαγιά
οι κέδροι
– μπορεί να μου
ρίξει και σκόνη
Ωστόσο
να
Αρκετά
κοντά μου
είναι τα σπάρτα
Ποια
σκοτεινιά
θα νιώσουν κι αυτά
Ο
ήλιος χαμηλώνει
η ελιά ρίχνει τον
ίσκιο της
Φυσάει
και λυγίζουν προς το φως
Χρήστος
Σιορίκης, Παίδες πηγών
Ulm Stool
The
Ulm Stool was designed by Max Bill and Hans Gugelot in 1955 for the
influential Ulm School of Design which saw itself as the legitimate
West German heir to the Bauhaus School. Minimize design, maximize
usage: with this credo Max Bill designed the simple yet perfect Ulm
Stool. The Ulm Stool belongs to the movement of concrete art - a
movement that promoted sobriety and simplicity of lines and shapes.
Max Bill's Ulm Stool (also known as the Max Bill Ulmer Hocker) is a
revered Bauhaus icon that has transcended time and space. Light and
robust, this Donald Judd-like minimalistic piece of furniture is one
of those items that never looks out of place, wherever it is placed.
The success of the Ulm Stool lies in its versatility and convenience:
it is not just a seat, it can also be used as a side table, shelf
unit, box for transportation, a serving tray or a bedside table-top
unit. It is easy, simple, minimalist and looks like a little piece of
art.
Wednesday, July 5, 2017
Untitled
Wind-hounder,
mind-rambler, sky-soarer,
maker
of autumn storms,
shaper
of agitated thoughts,
chasing
away the azure!
Hear
me, you insane seeker,
race
and rush,
hurtle
by you unchained
intoxicator
of storms.
Elena
Guro, 1913
4.543 billion. The matter of matter
Alexandra
Navratil, Detail of ‘Modern Magic’ (2013), courtesy the artist
and Dan Gunn, Berlin
4.543
billion. The matter of matter’ is an exhibition that addresses
works of art, collections and cultural histories in relation to
ecological processes and a geological scale of time. It presents a
continuum of materials and temporal landscapes – films, works on
paper, photographs, sculptures, documents, and other meaningful
things – and springs from the CAPC
building’s former life
as a warehouse for colonial commodities whose limestone walls were
once deep in the ground and whose wooden beams were once part of a
forest.
A
central proposal of the exhibition is that works of art are part of
geophysical history as much as art history. ‘4.543 billion’
attempts to take into account both a micro-local and a planetary
perspective, and to rethink some of the histories of art as fragments
of broader narratives about the Earth and how our place in it has
been represented. What is at stake when art and museums take on
greater temporal and material awareness? How might they move beyond a
spatial framework of “think globally, act locally”, to “think
historically, act geologically”?
This
exhibition takes a situated view of the past that resists an
undifferentiated narrative in which modernity in general is at fault
for global ecological disarray, or humanity in an invariably abstract
sense must take responsibility. Accordingly, the artists included
instead often address the specific roles and purposeful effects of
individuals, practices, states or corporations in an account of how
mineral agents and organic processes have intertwined with and
underpinned culture. Several of the more documentary projects on
display trace the relationships between Modern art, the museum, and
wealth created through extractive industry, combining approaches
framed by Earth sciences with colonial history, sociology and
political reportage. Yet other works take a more atmospheric, filmic,
sculptural or graphic approach to extraction, economy, energy and
global exchange, whether orbiting around sunlight, forests, synthetic
materials derived from fossil fuels, or the services and substances
entailed in buildings that display art
With
the participation of: A.J. Aalders, Lara Almarcegui, Maria Thereza
Alves, Félix Arnaudin, Amy Balkin, Alessandro Balteo-Yazbeck in
collaboration with Media Farzin, Bernd Becher and Hilla Becher,
Étienne Denisse, Hubert Duprat, Giulio Ferrario, Ângela Ferreira,
Anne Garde, Ambroise-Louis Garneray, Terence Gower, Rodney Graham,
Ilana Halperin (also at the Université de Bordeaux’s zoology
department), Marianne Heier, Christina Hemauer and Roman Keller,
Lucas Ihlein and Louise Kate Anderson, Jannis Kounellis, Martín
Llavaneras, Erlea Maneros Zabala, Nicholas Mangan, Fiona Marron,
Alexandra Navratil, Xavier Ribas, Alfred Roll, Amie Siegel, Lucy
Skaer, Alfred Smith, Rayyane Tabet, Pierre Théron, Pep Vidal,
Alexander Whalley Light, Stuart Whipps (also at the Musée des
Beaux-Arts) as well as documents and objects lent by the archives of
the CAPC, the Archives Bordeaux Métropole, the Archives
départementales de la Gironde, and the geology collection of the UFR
Sciences de la Terre et de la Mer, Université de Bordeaux.
Curated
by Latitudes
CAPC
musée d’art contemporain de Bordeaux
29
June 2017–7 January 2018
Sunday, July 2, 2017
Desert Rose
Desert roses are crystal-like formations and may produce a rose shape, multiple plates adjoining at
angles or the formations may look like a cluster
of cereal flakes
Praying for the Sun
Somebody,
a
friend, a bit more than a friend
uses
one kind of emoji the most in our WhatsApp
chat.
The emoji I mean shows two hands in a
praying
position with a shine around it. You imagine
a
bright sun behind the hands. She's hidden like
a
little piece of gold.
When
will
this
bit more than a friend,
this
friend,
this
somebody
open
his hands and let the sun shine straight
away?
Lucia Graf, 2017
A Certain Blue of the Sea
The
history of art is inseparable from the history of colour and in this
history, blue has always been associated with vastness, ‘blue has
no dimensions. It is beyond dimensions,’ as Yves Klein described.
Ultramarine
blue derives from lapis lazuli, a gemstone that for centuries could
only be found in a single mountain range in Afghanistan. For hundreds
of years, the cost of lapis lazuli rivaled even the price of gold.
Humans
with reduced blue sensitivity have difficulty identifying differences
between blue and yellow, violet and red and blue and green. To these
humans our ecosphere appears as generally red, pink, black, white,
grey and turquoise. Blue appears green and yellow appears violet or
light grey for humans with tritanopia, namely, for those who lack
blue cone cells.
Visual
perception is one of the most important mediums for our acquisition
of knowledge and for our experience of our environment, of the
physical world including our own bodies and others, while, colour is
one of the most dominant components of our perception. Nevertheless,
the physical world and the world of objects do not contain colour and
aren’t coloured as we experience them. Colour isn’t a physical
property of objects, thus, our blood is not red, the sea isn’t
blue, the trees aren’t green…
The
colour appearance of an object can be changed by changing the colour
of light that shines on it and the colour of visible light depends on
its wavelength. White light is composed of all of the colours of the
rainbow, because it contains all wavelengths, and it is described as
polychromatic light. Colour glows with the light of the radiant sun
and creates a relentless spectacle of sheer visibility, of an intense
luminosity that can even be blinding.
Drawing
from our different perceptions of colour, colour vision deficiency
and even “achromatopsia” (total colour blindness), the 40
participating artists of the Group Exhibition will trace the
different interpretations of the notion of colour as sensation,
visual and sensorial experience, psychological property of visual
experiences, mental property, representation and construction of the
brain.
Dimitris
Zouroudis ~ Katerina Zacharopoulou ~ Antonis Tsakiris ~ Adonis
Volanakis ~ Kostis Velonis ~ Filippos Tsitsopoulos ~ Danae Stratou ~
Aggelos Skourtis ~ Christina Sgouromiti ~ George Sampsonidis ~ Nana
Sachini ~ Nikos Navridis ~ Marina Provatidou ~ Artemis Potamianou~
Brigitte Polemis ~ Hara Piperidou ~ Aemilia Papafilippou ~ Antonia
Papatzanaki~ Nikos Papadopoulos
~
Margarita Myrogianni ~ Maro Michalakakos ~ Leon Michail ~ Iliodora
Margellos ~ Christos Kostoulas (Captain) ~ Esmeralda Kosmatopoulos ~
Peggy Kliafa ~ Maria Katrantzi ~ Irini Karayannopoulou ~ Nikos
Kanarelis ~ Sofia Housou ~ Aspassio Haronitaki ~ Cleopatra Haritou ~
Yioula Hadjigeorgiou ~ Kleio Gizeli ~ Maria Georgoula ~ Sandra
Christou ~ Venia Bechraki ~ Rania Bellou ~ Evgenia Apostolou ~ Lydia
Andrioti
Curator:
Sozita Goudouna
Ionian
Parliament ~ Island of Corfu
4-31
July
GOD & SAUSAGES
“After
that' said Gargantua, 'I wiped myself with a kerchief, with a pillow,
with a slipper, with a game-bag, with a basket - but what an
unpleasant arse-wiper that was! - then with a hat. And note that some
hats are smooth, some shaggy, some velvety, some of taffeta, and some
of satin. The best of all are the shaggy ones, for they make a very
good abstersion of the fecal matter. Then I wiped myself with a hen,
a cock, and a chicken, with a calf's skin, a hare, a pigeon, and a
cormorant, with a lawyer's bag, with a penitent's hood, with a coif,
with an otter. But to conclude, I say and maintain that there is no
arse-wiper like a well-downed goose, if you hold her neck between
your legs. You must take my word for it, you really must. You get a
miraculous sensation in your arse-hole, both from the softness of the
down and from the temperate heat of the goose herself; and this is
easily communicated to the bum-gut and the rest of the intestines,
from which it reaches the heart and the brain. Do not imagine that
the felicity of the heroes and demigods in the Elysian Fields arises
from their asphodel, their ambrosia, or their nectar, as those
ancients say. It comes, in my opinion, from their wiping their arses
with the neck of a goose, and that is the opinion of Master Duns
Scotus too.’
‘The
Life of Gargantua & Pantagruel’, Francois Rabelais
God
& Sausages brings together a group of works that try out
satirical adaptations, purposeless rituals, close-up observations,
bodily encounters and micro-jokes. Stemming from personal
perplexities and tracing inner entities, the works feast on a type of
corporeal knowledge or excess, that can be found in introspective
play and that can be revealing.
Lucy
Clout
Magdalena
Drwiega
Rafael
Perez Evans
Maria
Georgoula
Paul
Housley
Stelios
Karamanolis
Kostas
Sahpazis
Ian
Whitfield
curated
by Maria Georgoula
July
6 – July 16
Lekka
23-25 & Perikleous Stoa Zerbini Athens
Wednesday, June 28, 2017
Abstract composition
Sunday, June 25, 2017
Electricity
Two
threads are twined together
Exposed
are their hearts.
Those
“Yes” and “No” aren’t blended,
Entwined
remain apart.
Their
dusky intersection
Is
lifeless and confined,
There
will be resurrection,
And
they await that time.
The
ends will meet caressing,
Those
“Yes” and “No” unite,
And
“Yes” and “No” are pressing,
While
waking and embracing,
In
death they’ll turn to Light.
Zinaida Gippius,1901
Labels:
Poetry,
Russian avant-garde,
Russian Poetry
Πεινασμένος Pinocchio: Το άγχος της εκμηδένισης και η επιθυμία για αδηφαγία στο σχεδιασμό
Στις
«περιπέτειες του Pinocchio» όταν o μάστρο-Αντόνιο
πήρε το τσεκούρι για να φτιάξει ένα πόδι
για το τραπεζάκι του από ένα κούτσουρο,
δεν υπολόγιζε ότι είχε ανθρώπινη φωνή.
Και όταν θα χάριζε το κούτσουρο
στον ξυλογλύπτη
Geppetto
ούτε ο ίδιος και ο φίλος του θα
φανταζόντουσαν ότι από αυτό το κομμάτι
ξύλο που συνήθως προορίζεται για το
τζάκι, μια μαριονέτα θα κινείται
αυτόνομα χωρίς κρίκους και νήματα. Η
φιλοδοξία του Geppetto για μια μαριονέτα
που θα χόρευε, θα ξιφομαχούσε και θα
έκανε τούμπες για να του εξασφαλίσει
κάποια χρήματα δεν είχε καμία σχέση με
την κατάληξη του ατίθασου Pinocchio και τη
στενή σχέση γιου προς πατέρα.
Μπορούμε
άραγε να υποθέσουμε ότι ο συγγραφέας
του Pinocchio, Carlo Collodi (1826-1890) μεταβιβάζει
στον μάστορα Tζεπέτο την ιδιότητα του
να γίνει ένας μεσήλικας, εργένης
πατέρας με την χρήση της μήτιδος, την
κατεργαριά και με τη φαντασία των χεριών;
Αν ακολουθήσουμε πιστά την αφήγηση του
Ιταλού συγγραφέα τα πράγματα περιπλέκονται
ακόμη περισσότερο όταν πριν την ολοκλήρωση
της κούκλας στα χέρια του ξυλογλύπτη
Geppetto εκείνη μετατρέπεται στο γνωστό
μας Pinocchio.
Γνωρίζουμε
ότι το παιδί έχει την δυνατότητα να
διαχωρίζει τον κόσμο του παιχνιδιού
από την πραγματικότητα ενώ του αρέσει
να συνδέει τα φανταστικά αντικείμενα
και τις συνθήκες που επινοεί με απτά
και ορατά αντικείμενα. Όμως στην περίπτωση
του εξαθλιωμένου από τη φτώχεια αλλά
ονειροπόλου Geppetto αυτή η σύνδεση
συνεχίζεται με έναν αναπληρωματικό ή
υποκατάστατο σχηματισμό 1. Πρόκειται
για την φαντασίωση, η οποία είναι κοινή
σε όλους τους ενήλικες, με τη διαφορά
ότι ο μαραγκός από την Τοσκάνη αδυνατεί
να τη διαφοροποιήσει από την πραγματικότητα.
Η
κινητήρια επιθυμία του Geppetto να γίνει
πατέρας οδηγεί στην υποκατάσταση
της μαριονέτας με τον Pinocchio που είναι
εξανθρωπισμένος. Αυτό το συμβάν έχει
σημασία για το υποκείμενο που το υιοθετεί,
γιατί είναι μια ύστατη πράξη διόρθωσης
της δυσάρεστης πραγματικότητας, που
κάνει την έννοια της «ψευδαίσθησης» να
έχει βιολογική και οργανική υπόσταση.
http://popaganda.gr/pinasmenos-pinocchio/
Saturday, June 24, 2017
Piano Stool : Footnotes
Saturday, June 17, 2017
Marathon Marathon
This event celebrates the publication of Marathon Marathon that brings together the interviews that Hans Ulrich Obrist conducted at the Acropolis Museum in Athens in 2010. The Marathon Marathon project was co-curated by Nadja Argyropoulou and took place between October 31st and November 1st, 2010 so as to coincide with the celebrations for the 2500th anniversary of the Battle of Marathon and address emerging concerns on identity, history, and power.
The publication includes interviews and contributions by
Etel Adnan, Andreas Angelidakis, Athanasios Argianas, Nairy Baghramian, Daniel Birnbaum, Anna Boghiguian, Vlassis Caniaris, Dimitris Dimitriadis, Simon Fujiwara, Phoebe Giannisi, Nikolaus Hirsch, Jeff Koons, Giorgos Koumendakis, Panos Koutrouboussis, Armand Marie Leroi, Natalia Mela, Benedikt Morandi, Sarah Morris, Luigi Ontani, Christodoulos Panayiotou, Leda Papaconstantinou, Yiannis Papadakis, Angelos Papadimitriou, Maria Papadimitriou, Vassilis Papavassiliou, Julia Peyton-Jones, Huang Yong Ping, Angelo Plessas, Aimilia Salvanou, Yorgos Sapountzis, Societé Réaliste & Georgios Papadopoulos, Christiana Soulou, Yorgos Tzirtzilakis, Nanos Valaoritis, Jannis Varelas, Kostis Velonis, Vangelis Vlahos, and Zyranna Zateli.
Etel Adnan, Andreas Angelidakis, Athanasios Argianas, Nairy Baghramian, Daniel Birnbaum, Anna Boghiguian, Vlassis Caniaris, Dimitris Dimitriadis, Simon Fujiwara, Phoebe Giannisi, Nikolaus Hirsch, Jeff Koons, Giorgos Koumendakis, Panos Koutrouboussis, Armand Marie Leroi, Natalia Mela, Benedikt Morandi, Sarah Morris, Luigi Ontani, Christodoulos Panayiotou, Leda Papaconstantinou, Yiannis Papadakis, Angelos Papadimitriou, Maria Papadimitriou, Vassilis Papavassiliou, Julia Peyton-Jones, Huang Yong Ping, Angelo Plessas, Aimilia Salvanou, Yorgos Sapountzis, Societé Réaliste & Georgios Papadopoulos, Christiana Soulou, Yorgos Tzirtzilakis, Nanos Valaoritis, Jannis Varelas, Kostis Velonis, Vangelis Vlahos, and Zyranna Zateli.
Book
Launch of MARATHON MARATHON
Sunday,
June 18 at 18:30
Benaki
Museum, Main Building
Wednesday, June 7, 2017
Antidoron
Kostis
Velonis, Life without democracy, 2009
3.90
m x 1.90 m x 42 cm
As
documenta 14 continues its journey in Athens, having the National
Museum of Contemporary Art (EMST) as its main exhibition venue, an
important part of the EMST collection travels to Germany, to be part
of documenta 14 program in Kassel (10/6-17/9/17). The exhibition
ANTIDORON. The EMST Collection will occupy the whole emblematic
building of Fridericianum. It comprises 82 artists and 180 works and
it is curated by the Director of EMST, Mrs. Katerina Koskina,
supported by Stamatis Schizakis and Tina Pandi, Assistant Curators
and Iro Nikolakea in the Architectural design. It is presented in the
framework of the Museum’s series EMST in the World.
The
exhibition at the Fridericianum marks the first time that the most
part of the EMST collection is presented outside Greece, through a
double relocation that renders EMST’s home, one of the main venues
of documenta 14 in Athens, and the Fridericianum, traditionally the
centerpiece of a documenta, the temporary home of EMST’s
collection.
EMST
began creating its collection in 2000. Its acquisitions now include
more than 1,100 works by Greek and international artists from the
1960s onward. The exhibition ANTIDORON. The EMST Collection is an
adapted version of the extensive museological study that will be
displayed in full at the EMST spaces. Presented in the Fridericianum,
the birthplace of documenta and the first public museum in Europe,
the exhibition deals with issues of border crossings, diasporas,
cultural exchange, existential quests, and mythologies, as well as
personal and collective memories. Additionally, the Fridericianum’s
brief tenure as Germany’s first parliamentary building makes it the
most appropriate venue in which to show the works of several artists,
active during the troubled postwar era and the ensuing decades of
political upheaval and revolutionary re-imagination of society.
While
the presentation of the collection maintains its international scope,
it also emphasizes the presence of pioneering Greek artists,
highlighting and revisiting their national and international
journeys.
The
title embodies the mutual respect of both institutions, documenta 14
and EMST independently of their diverse commitments and missions, to
discourse and to reinterpret essential issues and visual language. It
deals with concepts such as trading, exchanging, sharing, giving and
offering Antidoron (αντίδωρον, literally the return of a
gift) or Antidanion (αντιδάνειo, the return of a loan either
linguistic, cultural, or financial). The prefix “anti” reveals a
distinct position and consequently a view, not necessarily opposed
to, but departing from a different point in order to communicate, to
argue, to bridge, to converge, and to accept each other’s’
stances.
Until
September 17, Fridericianum in Kassel becomes EMST’s contemporary
home in Germany, and ANTIDORON, a gift in return – when translated
– symbolizing the shared benefits of this collaboration.
Dimitris
Alithinos, Nikos Alexiou, Andreas Angelidakis, Stephen Antonakos,
Janine Antoni, Alexis Akrithakis, Evgenia Apostolou, Athanasios
Argianas, Manolis Baboussis, Bertille Bak, Lynda Benglis, Andrea
Bowers, Chronis Botsoglou, Yiannis Bouteas, David Broomberg &
Oliver Chanarin, Constantin (Dikos) Byzantios, Pedro Cabrita Reis,
Vlassis Caniaris, Chryssa, Chandris Pantelis, Danil, Bia Davou,
George Drivas, Eirene Efstathiou, Haris Epaminonda, Koken Ergun, Jan
Fabre, Stelios Faitakis, Carlos Garaicoa, Kendell Geers, George
Hadjimichalis, Joana Hadjithomas & Khalil Joreige, Mona Hatoum,
Gary Hill, Emily Jacir, Gulsun Karamustafa, Nikos Kessanlis,
Kimsooja, Panos Kokkinias, Dimosthenis Kokkinidis, Joseth Kosuth,
Jannis Kounellis, Piotr Kowalski, Yorgos Lazongas, George Lappa, Ange
Leccia, Stathis Logothetis, Maria Loizidou, Andreas Lolis, Danny
Mathys, Yiannis Michas, Nikos Navridis, Nina Papaconstantinou,
Maria Papadimitriou, Aimilia Papafilippou, Ilias Papailiakis, Rena
Papaspyrou, Nausika Pastra, Pavlos, Jannis Psychopedis, Alexandros
Psychoulis, Walid Raad, Oliver Ressler, Lucas Samaras, Yorgos
Sapountzis, Allan Sekul, Vassilis Skylakos, Christiana Soulou, Aspa
Stasinopoulou, Takis, Thodoros, sculptor, Thanasis Totsikas, Nikos
Tranos, Stefanos Tsivopoulos, Costas Tsoclis, Dimitris Tzamouranis,
Costas Varotsos, Kostis Velonis, Bill Viola, Vangelis Vlahos,
Pantelis Xagoraris, Georgios Xenos
ANTIDORON.
The EMST Collection
Fridericianum,
Kassel
10
June- 17 September 2017
Monday, June 5, 2017
Is Our Universe a Fake?
Sunday, May 28, 2017
Where are we now: Struggling autonomies in closing times
Over
a period of a month a DIY exhibition of autonomous experiments,
activists actions and cultural interventions will evolve at Green
Park. Seeking to generate a public debate on both methods of cultural
autonomous initiatives and potential infrastructures appropriate for
current conditions this DIY archive will be gradually expanding
during this month. The exhibition accompanied with a series of public
events and be open to the public only on these days.
A
discussion with Jacques Rancière
Participants:
Thanos Andritsos, Akis Gavrilidis, Evangelia Ledaki, Eva Prousali,
Stavros Stavridis, Kostis Velonis, Despina Zefkili
This
action takes place as a pre-edition of second episode of DIY
Biennial.
31
May - 21 June 2017
Green
Park, Athens
28 May, 19.00
28 May, 19.00
Tuesday, May 23, 2017
Meeting on the Astral Plane
Kάτω από τον αριστερισμό του Malevich
Alphonse
Allais, Combat de Nègres dans une cave pendant la nuit. Estampe
(1897)
Είναι
βάσιμο να υποστηριχτεί ότι κάποιοι
καλλιτέχνες συνεχίζουν να δρουν κάτω
από τον αριστερισμό του Malevich; Τι μπορεί
να σημαίνει αυτό πέρα από μια πιθανή
εξιδανικευμένη ανάγνωση της άρνησης
του τέλους μιας ιστορίας της νεωτερικότητας;
Η
τέχνη του Malevich και η συνειδητή του
απόκλιση από τις «προπαγανδιστικές»
εκτροπές των συναδέλφων του στη ρωσική
πρωτοπορία χρησιμεύει και σήμερα ως
ένα σημείο αναφοράς σε καλλιτέχνες που
δεν ακολουθούν τις σειρήνες της
επικαιρότητας. Μια μεταμαλεβιτσική
λογική μπορεί να ανιχνευθεί και στον
ελλαδικό χώρο και, συγκεκριμένα, στο
έργο του Τάκη, της Ρένας Παπασπύρου, του
Άγγελου Σκούρτη, του Γιάννη Παπαδόπουλου,
της Λητώς Κάττου και της Ευγενίας
Αποστόλου, με πολύ διαφορετικό κάθε
φορά τρόπο, στην ίδια ωστόσο γραμμή της
συνειδητής απόκλισης από τη γλώσσα του
σουπρεματισμού.
Ο
Malevich μπορεί να χρησιμοποιηθεί ως ένα
παράδειγμα που ενισχύει τον συνδετικό
κρίκο με το προνεωτερικό Βυζάντιο, ώστε
και οι πιο ερμητικές αποφάνσεις της
ελληνικής πρωτοπορίας να μην φαντάζουν
απαραίτητα ξεκομμένες από το διάλογο
με τον ίδιο τον ελληνισμό και την επέκτασή
του «προς ανατολάς». Ωστόσο, δεν πρέπει
να στηριζόμαστε τόσο στην επίδραση της
βυζαντινής αγιογραφίας στο έργο του
Malevich. Ο Malevich πάνω από όλα υπήρξε ένας
πολωνικής καταγωγής καθολικός ριζοσπάστης
διανοούμενος που ανανέωσε αλλά και
αποδόμησε συνειδητά την ορθόδοξη
παράδοση.
http://avgi-anagnoseis.blogspot.gr/2017/05/blog-post_44.html#more
Monday, May 1, 2017
Ο δρόμος προς την κυβόσχημη κατοίκηση : Η έννοια της διαμονής στο έργο του Μalevich
Η
διάλεξη επικεντρώνεται στο τρόπο που
ο Malevich αντιλαμβάνεται το διάνοιγμα σε
μια κοσμολογική κατοίκηση την ίδια
χρονική περίοδο που εκπρόσωποι του
κυβοφουτουρισμού δίναν έμφαση στη
διαδικασία της απόδρασης και της
εξόδου.Το έργο του Malevich θα ερμηνευθεί
μέσα απο τη χαϊντεγκεριανή κριτική για
το έργο του Hölderlin θεωρώντας οτι η ποιητική
διαδικασια που ενυπάρχει σε κάθε έκφραση
είναι εκείνη που αφήνει να εισέλθει το
κατοικείν του ανθρώπου στην ουσία του
και να ορίσει με αφορμή το 'μαυρο
τετράγωνο' του ρώσου πρωτοπόρου την
οντολογική διάσταση του εκπατρισμένου.
Labels:
art theory,
domesticity,
domesticity and modernism,
Philosophy,
Russian avant-garde,
Suprematism,
Symposium and Conversations
Sunday, April 30, 2017
In lieblicher Bläue..
In lieblicher Bläue blühet
mit dem metallenen Dache der Kirchthurm. Den umschwebet
Geschrei der Schwalben, den umgiebt die rührendste Bläue.
Die Sonne gehet hoch darüber und färbet das Blech,
im Winde aber oben stille krähet die Fahne.
Wenn einer unter der Glocke dann herabgeht, jene Treppen,
ein stilles Leben ist es, weil,
wenn abgesondert so sehr die Gestalt ist,
die Bildsamkeit herauskommt dann des Menschen.
Die Fenster, daraus die Glocken tönen, sind wie Thore an Schönheit.
Nemlich, weil noch der Natur nach sind die Thore,
haben diese die Ähnlichkeit von Bäumen des Walds.
Reinheit aber ist auch Schönheit.
Innen aus Verschiedenem entsteht ein ernster Geist.
So sehr einfältig aber die Bilder, so sehr heilig sind die, daß
man wirklich oft fürchtet, die zu beschreiben.
Die Himmlischen aber, die immer gut sind,
alles zumal, wie Reiche, haben diese, Tugend und Freude.
Der Mensch darf das nachahmen.
Darf, wenn lauter Mühe das Leben, ein Mensch
aufschauen und sagen: so will ich auch seyn?
Ja. So lange die Freundlichkeit noch am Herzen, die Reine,
dauert, misset nicht unglücklich der Mensch sich
der Gottheit.
Ist unbekannt Gott? Ist er offenbar wie die Himmel?
dieses glaub' ich eher. Des Menschen Maaß ist's.
Voll Verdienst, doch dichterisch,
wohnet der Mensch auf dieser Erde. Doch reiner
ist nicht der Schatten der Nacht mit den Sternen,
wenn ich so sagen könnte,
als der Mensch, der heißet ein Bild der Gottheit.
Giebt auf Erden ein Maaß?
Es giebt keines. Nemlich
es hemmen der Donnergang nie die Welten des Schöpfers.
Auch eine Blume ist schön, weil sie blühet unter der Sonne.
Es findet das Aug' oft im Leben
Wesen, die viel schöner noch zu nennen wären
als die Blumen. O! ich weiß das wohl!
Denn zu bluten an Gestalt und Herz,
und ganz nicht mehr zu seyn, gefällt das Gott ?
Die Seele aber, wie ich glaube, muß rein bleiben,
sonst reicht an das Mächtige auf Fittigen der Adler mit lobendem Gesange
und der Stimme so vieler Vögel.
Es ist die Wesenheit, die Gestalt ist's.
Du schönes Bächlein, du scheinest rührend, indem du rollest so klar,
wie das Auge der Gottheit, durch die Milchstraße.
Ich kenne dich wohl,
aber Thränen quillen aus dem Auge. Ein heiteres Leben
seh' ich in den Gestalten mich umblühen der Schöpfung, weil
ich es nicht unbillig vergleiche den einsamen Tauben auf dem Kirchhof.
Das Lachen aber scheint mich zu grämen der Menschen,
nemlich ich hab' ein Herz.
Möcht' ich ein Komet seyn?
Ich glaube. Denn sie haben Schnelligkeit der Vögel; sie blühen an Feuer,
und sind wie Kinder an Reinheit.
Größeres zu wünschen, kann nicht des Menschen Natur sich vermessen.
Der Tugend Heiterkeit verdient auch gelobt zu werden vom ernsten Geiste,
der zwischen den drei Säulen wehet
des Gartens. Eine schöne Jungfrau muß das Haupt umkränzen
mit Myrthenblumen, weil sie einfach ist
ihrem Wesen nach und ihrem Gefühl. Myrthen aber
giebt es in Griechenland.
Wenn einer in den Spiegel siehet,
ein Mann, und siehet darinn sein Bild, wie abgemahlt;
es gleicht dem Manne.
Augen hat des Menschen Bild,
hingegen Licht der Mond.
Der König Ödipus hat ein Auge zuviel vielleicht.
Diese Leiden dieses Mannes, sie scheinen unbeschreiblich, unaussprechlich,
unausdrüklich.
Wenn das Schauspiel ein solches darstellt, kommt's daher.
Wie ist mir's aber, gedenk' ich deiner jetzt?
Wie Bäche reißt des Ende von Etwas mich dahin,
welches sich wie Asien ausdehnet.
Natürlich dieses Leiden, das hat Ödipus.
Natürlich ist's darum.
Hat auch Herkules gelitten?
Wohl. Die Dioskuren in ihrer Freundschaft
haben die nicht Leiden auch getragen? Nemlich
wie Herkules mit Gott zu streiten, das ist Leiden.
Und die Unsterblichkeit im Neide dieses Leben,
diese zu theilen, ist ein Leiden auch.
Doch das ist auch ein Leiden, wenn mit Sommerflecken ist bedeckt ein Mensch,
mit manchen Flecken ganz überdeckt zu seyn! Das thut die schöne Sonne:
nemlich die ziehet alles auf.
Die Jünglinge führt die Bahn sie mit Reizen ihrer Strahlen
wie mit Rosen.
Die Leiden scheinen so,
die Ödipus getragen,
als wie ein armer Mann klagt,
daß ihm etwas fehle.
Sohn Laios, armer Fremdling in Griechenland!
Leben ist Tod, und Tod ist auch ein Leben
Friedrich Hölderlin
In
lovely blue blooms the steeple with its metal
roof.
Around the roof swirls the swallows’ cry,
surrounded
by most touching blue. The sun rises high
above
and tints the roof tin. But in the wind beyond, silently,
a
weathercock crows. When someone comes forth from
the
stairs of the belfry, it is a still life. And though the form
is
so utterly strange, it becomes the figure of a
human
being. The windows out of which the bells resound are as
gates
to beauty. Because gates still take after nature
they
resemble forest trees. Purity, too, is beauty. From within, out
of
diverse things, a grave spirit emerges. So simple,
these
images, so holy, that one often fears
to
describe them. But the heavenly ones, always
good,
possess, even more than the wealthy, virtue and
joy.
Humans may follow suit. Might a person, when
life
is full of trouble, look up and say: I, too,
want
to be like this? Yes. As long as friendliness and purity
dwell
in our hearts, we may measure ourselves not unfavorably
with
the divine. Is God unknown? Is he manifest
as
the sky? This I tend to believe. It is the measure
of
the human. Deserving, yet poetically, we dwell
on
this earth. The shadow of night with its stars,
if
I may say so, is no purer than we
who
exist in the image of the divine
Is
there measure on earth? There is none. For
the
creator’s worlds can never contain the clap of thunder.
Because
it blooms under the sun, a flower, too, is beautiful.
In
life, the eye often finds creatures to call more beautiful
still
than flowers. Oh! I know this well!
For
to bleed in body and heart and cease to be whole—
does
this please God? The soul, I believe, must remain
pure,
or else the eagle will wing its way to the almighty
with
songs of praise and the voice of so many
birds.
It is substance and it is form. Beautiful little
brook,
so touching you seem as you roll so clear,
like
the eye of God, through the Milky Way. I know
you
well. But tears stream from my eyes. A clear
life
I see in the forms of creation that blooms around me
because
I do not compare them unreasonably with the lonely pigeons
in
the churchyard. People’s laughter seems
to
grieve me—after all, I have a heart. Would I
like
to be a comet? I believe so. For they have the quickness
of
birds, they blossom in fire, and in their purity is as children’s.
To
wish for more is beyond the measure of human nature.
The
clarity of virtue also deserves praise from the grave
spirit
that blows between the garden’s three pillars. A beautiful virgin
must
garland
her head with myrtle, for to do so is simply
her
nature and her sensibility. But myrtle trees are found in Greece.
When
a person looks into a mirror and sees
his
image, as if painted, that is like the Manes.
The
human form has eyes, but the moon has light.
Perhaps
King Oedipus had an eye too many. This
man’s
suffering seems indescribable, unspeakable,
inexpressible.
When the drama presents it so, so it is. But how is it with me?
Am
I thinking now of your suffering? Like brooks, the end of
Something
as vast as Asia is carrying me toward it. Oedipus, of course,
suffered like this, too;
and
certainly for the same reason. Did Hercules suffer as well? Of
course.
Did
not the Dioscuri, too, in their friendship bear pain?
As
Hercules fought with God—that is
suffering.
And immortality in envy of this life—
to
divide these two—that, too, is suffering. But it is also
suffering
when a person is covered with freckles—
to
be completely covered with freckles! The beautiful
sun
does that, for it draws out everything. The path
seduces
the young with the charm of its rays, like roses.
Oedipus’s
suffering is like a poor man
wailing
that he is deprived. Son Laios, poor
stranger
in Greece. Life is death, and
death
is also a life.
Friedrich
Hölderlin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

























